home |
build diary << | show individual entries | >>April 27, 2006: Larry Webster, hard at work. My first run was quick but messy and I proceeded to take big chunks of time out on every following one. I'd been afraid the course would favour 'Vettes as it had a couple of significant straights but it turned out that this wasn't a worry. My first run was 50.060 seconds. My fastest was a 46.620. The fastest Corvette? 51.450. Those straights got me up to 60 mph which is still in my full acceleration range. Now, if we'd been running up to 90 mph it would have been a different story! And a pretty odd autocross. It was a real pleasure running with the club. Despite my being an interloper - one who was rude enough to completely obliterate his hosts - they were very welcoming and ran a smooth event. It's a good group to run with and they now restrict "metal" cars to keep the numbers down. As it turned out, that wasn't a problem as there were only a dozen Corvettes and myself. The cornering ability of the Seven is what really impressed them while I got all excited by the noise of the Z-06 and C6 cars. Video of the fastest run is now online. The car ran pretty well. I loaded my "high altitude" settings back into the ECU but the Texas gas in the tank still meant I had to pull out a bunch of fuel. Once I burn it off (sigh) I'll have to go back to my crappy Colorado gas setup.
Until I got back up to Colorado. Despite tweaking my fuel map to sort out the high-power gasoline, I still had the big cloud of smoke. When pulling the filter off (again) to check to see if there was a problem with the butterfly synchronisation, I noticed that the aft throttles were pretty oily. They get the PCV line so there's always going to be some, but this seemed excessive. I tried removing the line from the PCV valve and boom! No more vacuum leak and no more smoke. There's always going to be some air coming in through a PCV at idle but this certainly indicated a problem. I pulled the valve out and it was hollow! I can't explain that one. Maybe the vibration of the trip to Texas caused the end of the possibly 16-year-old valve to break off. Despite disassembling the baffles in the valve cover, I couldn't find the missing pieces. Reassembling with a good valve showed that all my problems were solved. Sigh. It's always a bit of a hassle when something like this happens, but it's really embarrassing when it happens during a test. The bad idle that Larry commented on wasn't my fault at all and it was just poor timing. Oh well, I guess there's always some sort of regret. My hollow PCV valve on the left, a good one on the right.
I spent most of the weekend just puttering around instead. The Seven went out for a brief drive so I could follow SUVs at a crawling pace on the local fun roads. Yesterday was spent on a massive cleaning binge to empty the garage out for the next project. More information coming soon!
The real question is - why is the Mini only 150 lbs heavier than the Seven, despite being fitted with four seats, wind-up windows, a trunk, etc? My Seven is typical for a car of its type, weighing in right about the same as the non-Superlight Caterhams. It's not exactly porky. It's certainly something I ponder as I look at the two parked together in the garage. Perhaps the secret is the 10" wheels and 7.9" brakes on the little car...
There's a new project taking shape in the garage as well. My friend Eric and I have decided to take on the Targa Newfoundland. It's a major race and we're building a special car. You can see more at the team website: TargaMiata.com. By request, I've also added a list of my other projects on the other resources.
Mini: Okay, so they're not THAT close. Never mind. But the Seven looks quite a bit bigger when viewed solo, and parked side by side they appear identical in length.
On a completely unrelated note, I calculated that if my Cadillac had the same specific output as the engine in the Seven, it would make about 750 hp.
For those wondering about the price, that is the cost of the car as it sat in Texas at full retail and including a purchase price for the engine. My own costs were less. For example, the pedal assembly quoted at $350 included the pedals, master cylinders, residual pressure valves - and actually only cost $287 at retail instead of $350. When I think about it, I have no idea where I came up with the $350 number. It must have made sense at the time. I also assigned a cost to random parts that were sitting around my garage. I did not include the cost for parts I did not use, such as my original tie rods or fuel tank. It's tough coming up with an accounting for a project like this but I think the cost shown in the article is fair. I've said many times that it would cost about $7500 to duplicate my car with a few changes. Those changes get rid of expensive items such as the high-performance engine (listed as $1500 for C&D, because that's what I paid for it), the ECU (listed at $1400 or so) and paint (I paid $385 for the beautiful Lotus Chrome Orange). I've added a cost spreadsheet to my site to show how it all broke down for C&D. I must admit I've never been called a "crafty ringer" before though.
There's a comment in the article about how my car feels tighter than the others, and it's hypothesised that this is due to the frame. I think that does a disservice to Mark, Chris and Jon. All the frames are built to much the same design, with only slight variations for packaging reasons. I think the real difference is the result of the amount of time spent on the car dynamics. Chris and Mark's cars had only been running for an extremely short time before the test. It's not shown in the published pictures, but Mark's didn't even have any rear bodywork! Give them two years to work on their car setup and I expect those cars will feel pretty darn good as well. For example, I've changed brake pads, rotors, master cylinder sizes and brake bias since the first time my car turned a wheel. Had the test been done that first August weekend two years ago when it hit the track, the comments about the brakes would have been quite different. The same goes for other aspects of the car. The purchased frame gave me a head start on my build, but I don't think it necessarily made the final product any more effective. So what's next for the little orange car? Well, there's a track day coming up on July 9th. Since the very first drive was on July 4th, 2004 I think it will be a good opportunity for celebration. Will I be able to take a bit of time off the track record again? Hard to say. It's going to be hot. I'll definitely enjoy myself, though. It's been too long since the car was used for anything more than driving around local roads.
|