home |
build diary << | show individual entries | >>March 11, 2007: The car was amazingly good out of the box. It's very comfortable to sit in. There are no squeaks and rattles when driving around, and the suspension does an excellent job of suspending. Amazing. We did have a few little teething problems such as a clunk in the front suspension and an odd behavior caused by a short in the engine management computer that was fixed by removing the backside of the case, but by the time we'd had lunch it was up and running happily. So, how does it feel? Not bad at all. The steering (the optional quick rack) is very well done and the car responds pretty well to anything you ask. The front track is narrow relative to the rear and Westfield recommended very little front camber, and the result is that hard cornering is ruled by the need to get the front to stick. This means a more cautious approach to entering a corner to make sure you've got front-end grip, and the balance in fast sweepers is dictated by controlling understeer. With some shock adustments and a slight 10mm bump in front track, it got much better. We're going to dial in a bit more front camber (it's currently at about 0.2-0.3 degrees negative) to see if we can get some bite. Westfields are known for handling like this from what I understand, but it could be improved. It didn't stop me from hanging out the tail in a couple of corners and from obtaining a fairly neutral stance in the fast turn 1 sweeper. It just took a different driving style than in my car. There's also the matter of the brakes. I don't think the rears are contributing much at all and the right front wheel locks fairly easily. We'll do some cornerweighting to the car and see if I can adjust the proportioning front/rear somehow. Overall, Bill and I are very happy with the car. The two of us went out to play and found that the car was very closely matched with Janel's little Miata. The 1.6 Miata has a supercharger (about 150-155 at the wheels, I'd estimate), upgraded suspension and my poor abused Toyo RA-1s. The Westfield has a bone stock 1.6 with a Link ECU for engine management (perhaps 95 hp) and my old set of Falken Azenis RT-215, a slipperier tire than the Toyos. The Miata is very well sorted, the Westfield had only just come off the build stand. I think there's good potential there. The Westfield is alive! It's a great looking car once all the body panels are on, and it works very well right out of the box. Am I bragging? Sure, why not. Thanks to David at Grassroots Motorsports for the picture. Okay, enough of that. Thanks again to David at GRM for the picture. In the meantime, it's time to get some serious work done on the Targa Miata.
They had good things to say! Joe - the machinist - figured there was a good chance he could get it out. I left the head and went on to work. A couple of hours later, I got a phone call saying the lifter was out and that nothing was damaged other than the lifter and the valve. No worries there, they're littering the place. While installing my new springs, he also found that all my other lifters were showing really odd wear patterns from constant valve float. So he replaced all of them with the set I had pulled aside for the Targa Miata head. As I might have mentioned, I had the redline set a little high so I could stretch out one of the short chutes at the local track. Down in Texas, I think Burt had been leaning a little harder on the limiter to stretch a longer straight and the abused valvetrain just gave up. Well, I had told him it was safe to work the car hard. At lunch I stopped by to pick up my repaired head - one new (used) valve, 16 new (used) lifters and a new (new) set of valve springs. The used parts came out of the piles of spares that are sitting around at Flyin' Miata and in my garage. That was faster and easier than I'd expected! Back in December 2004, I had the head off the car to fix a problem with the pistons and I considered installing new valve springs to handle higher RPM. If you look carefully at the exhaust valve cutouts, you can see where the valves were hitting the pistons. I didn't see this the last time the head was off, so the float was obviously extreme recently despite the same redline. I cleaned up the pistons with a dremel to take the sharp edges off and some fine Scotchbrite soaked in carb cleaner removed the carbon. Cleaning the headgasket was done with a plastic scraper and a Shop-Vac powerful enough to lift carb cleaner right off the head. No metal shavings in here! At least, I did my best to avoid it.
If you're interested in a free copy, just stop by the GRM website and ask. The Seven is also featured on the front page of B.S. Levy's website along with the Atom. It's really interesting to see the cars together for the first time. We didn't spend a lot of time standing around looking at them, but you can see the differences in scuttle height and placement in this picture. I didn't have the ECU in the Seven set up for high altitude after the trip to Texas, so I was down on power a fair bit - this made the cars fairly evenly matched in a straight line until the Seven could clear its throat at around 5000 rpm. The biggest difference was in the suspension. The Westfield is much softer than my car and rides incredibly well, but I could see it running out of travel once in a while. I'd brace for the bump and the Seven would just drive right over it without any trouble. Bill turned up the damping a bit to compensate (he was running with two people, as was I) but I haven't heard what sort of difference that made. Naturally, Bill and I had a bit of fun on this road. It's about 40 miles of twists and turns and I know it pretty well. We had traffic on the way in to Moab, but we got a pretty clear run on the way back. For some reason, the Miata that was also running with us took a bit longer to get to the end of the road. entry 1364 Brandon rode with me on our trip to and from Moab. It's a pity you can't see what the wind was doing to his hair in motion - it was total chaos. And he was loving every minute of it. entry 1365 May 3, 2007: A lot of people don't seem to believe me when I say that I pulled the engine for the Seven out from under a bench at Flyin' Miata. Well, looking around for a certain picture, I came across this photo on the FM server. That's the Seven's engine on the end with the red cam gears (now found on the Targa Miata). Sure, it's been apart a couple of times since then, but you can see that it was indeed under a bench and covered in dust! The date on this picture is April 8, 2002. entry 1366 May 6, 2007: I received an email today containing a comment I've seen a few times before, and it has to do with the troubles I have with my engine management when I change altitude. The Link system I use doesn't usually have a problem with altitude changes, but I have two things about my car that makes it more sensitive than normal. First, my cams. I don't get a whole lot of vacuum at idle because of their overlap. Second, the throttle bodies. They make the car run in a very narrow range of vacuum. The end result is that when I change altitude - and that's not driving to the top of a hill, but 4000' of change - the range of vacuum my car operates in changes quite a bit. It's a problem that's particularly apparent with a Colorado car that has a tendency to travel around a lot. All of the Sevens on the cross-USA tour a couple of years ago were suffering badly from the change in air pressures - none of them had any way of compensating because they tended to run purely off throttle position. A different ECU might be able to compensate better with a blend of throttle position and pressure sensing. Perhaps a bit more adjustability in the breakpoints in the fuel map would help as well. But it's always going to be hard to be my particular setup to behave with massive altitude changes. At least it's easy to change out the program in the ECU (providing I remember!) and it's a whole lot easier than messing with carbs. I should also point out - in case it's not clear for those reading along - that the problems I was experiencing in Texas for the Car and Driver test had nothing to do with tuning. It was due to the broken PCV valve, something I didn't diagnose until I got back to Colorado.
|